The irony here is that--by saying he would take Chris Reed's word over Kathryn's--Rick Joyner is more likely to believe the one whom he has less rational basis to believe.
I mean seriously: you're going to trust an ordained minister who broke his wedding vows by taking sexual advantage of a student?
Also, if either of them have used "prophecy" in the course of grooming their victims, or to shut down inquiry into the offenses, then they are guilty of far more than sexual misconduct or even sexual abuse:. This is because, if they did those things, then they are false prophets.
The irony here is that--by saying he would take Chris Reed's word over Kathryn's--Rick Joyner is more likely to believe the one whom he has less rational basis to believe.
I mean seriously: you're going to trust an ordained minister who broke his wedding vows by taking sexual advantage of a student?
Also, if either of them have used "prophecy" in the course of grooming their victims, or to shut down inquiry into the offenses, then they are guilty of far more than sexual misconduct or even sexual abuse:. This is because, if they did those things, then they are false prophets.